Covington v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Appellant Ronald Covington, Jr., challenges his sentence of life without parole for the 2002 murder of three people. He argues that his sentence was inappropriate and that Indiana's life without parole statute violates the Sixth Amendment. We conclude that imposition of the life sentence was appropriate. Our cases are stare decisis against him on the constitutional claim. 'We therefore affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
On June 1, 2002, Covington forced his way into the apartment of Maranda Wilson (the mother of his two children) by kicking in the front door. He began…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Ajabu v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Andrew Conley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Mathew W. McCallister v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- William Clyde Gibson III v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Hightower v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Andrew Conley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.