United States v. Knott
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTIN, District Judge.
The federal courts provide a high level of representation to'defendants who cannot afford to retain counsel. The truly indigent often receive better representation than the defendant with a small amount of money who is able to retain private counsel. In this case, a defendant, indicted in a multi-defendant RICO case that the Government estimates will require a month to try, has assets in excess of $50,000. Despite possessing what many truly indigent defendants would consider great wealth, this defendant has asked to be assigned counsel under…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. KahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. John L. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,508 United States of America v. Norman RubinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Clark BracewellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. ConnollyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015