Legal Opinion

United States v. Knott

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 20, 2001No. 01 CR. 245(JSM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARTIN, District Judge.

The federal courts provide a high level of representation to'defendants who cannot afford to retain counsel. The truly indigent often receive better representation than the defendant with a small amount of money who is able to retain private counsel. In this case, a defendant, indicted in a multi-defendant RICO case that the Government estimates will require a month to try, has assets in excess of $50,000. Despite possessing what many truly indigent defendants would consider great wealth, this defendant has asked to be assigned counsel under…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. KahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. John L. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,508 United States of America v. Norman RubinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Clark BracewellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ConnollyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  2. United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API