Legal Opinion

Frey v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 25, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Settle—

Reversing.

The matter presented for decision by this appeal is the construction that should be given the following deed:

“This deed between Margaret Schlosser of the city of Owensboro, Ky., of the first part, and Margaret Prey and Joseph Prey of the same city and state, of the second part.
“Witnesseth: That the said party of the first part in consideration of Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars cash in hand paid, the recipt of which is hereby acknowledged,' does hereby sell and convey to the parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. McFarland v. HatchettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Frank v. UnzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  5. Commonwealth v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Corporation v. AlcornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Childers v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Farley v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Hargis v. Flesher Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Hall v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API