Legal Opinion
Soltesz v. Rushmore Plaza Civic Center
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 26, 2012No. CIV. 11-5012-JLVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JEFFREY L. VIKEN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kyle Soltesz, d/b/a Top Dog Enterprises, filed a complaint against defendants alleging a violation of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims for breach of contract, conversion, and tortious interference with business relations. (Docket 1). Defendants filed their answer and counterclaim generally denying plaintiffs claims and asserting their own claims for breach of contract, failure to restore premises, fraud and deceit, rescission, and…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dollar Loan Ctr. of S.D., LLC v. AfdahlUnited States District Court · 2018