Legal Opinion

Aguilar v. Southeast Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 29, 1997No. 96-3075PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Resolution of this ease requires an interpretation of Florida law regarding compulsory . counterclaims. The specific issue is whether the compulsory counterclaim rule applies when the putative counter-claimant in an in rem foreclosure action is not a party to the mortgage agreement which is the subject of the foreclosure. The outcome of this case has the potential to affect a large percentage of foreclosure actions in Florida. Because the ramifications of the decision in this case could have far-reaching effects on property law in Florida, we believe it should be resolved by Florida’s highest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Londono v. Turkey Creek, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Turkey Creek, Inc. v. LondonoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Southeast Bank, NASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Aguilar v. Southeast BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Aguilar v. Southeast Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. McGee v. World Business Lenders, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API