Legal Opinion

Neponsit Realty Co. v. Judge

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtFaber, J.

This is an action for specific performance. Plaintiff and defendant John C. Judge entered *446into a written contract, dated August 25, 1914, for the sale of certain filled-in real estate at Neponsit, L. I., consisting of four lots, for the sum of $1,900, to be paid in installments. After making payments pursuant to the terms of such contract for about one year, the defendant John C. Judge, on October 15, 1915, with the consent of the plaintiff, assigned the same to the defendant Helen C. Judge, who continued to make the payments required by said contract down to about June 1, 1917, when $1,054…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Hathaway v. . PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Sewell v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Hellreigel v. . ManningNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunseath v. HallauerWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Pellegrino v. GiulianiNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API