Putnam v. Russell
Supreme Court of Vermont
These were bills brought to foreclose the equity of redemption of mortgaged premises, and, the material facts in each case being the same, they were heard together upon bills and answers. . The orators alleged, in their bills, that Francis Dow, deceased, of whose estate the defendants were administrators, being in his lifetime indebted to one Samuel Austin, Jr., executed to him three promissory notes, and secured the same by mortgages of the premises described in the bills;…
Read the full summary
These were bills brought to foreclose the equity of redemption of mortgaged premises, and, the material facts in each case being the same, they were heard together upon bills and answers. . The orators alleged, in their bills, that Francis Dow, deceased, of whose estate the defendants were administrators, being in his lifetime indebted to one Samuel Austin, Jr., executed to him three promissory notes, and secured the same by mortgages of the premises described in the bills; and that Austin, after the decease of Dow, transferred the said notes, and assigned the mortgages, to the orators. The…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hebard, J.
These are bills brought to foreclose the equity of redemption in certain mortgaged premises. The notes secured, and the mortgage deeds, were executed by one Francis Dow, now deceased, to one Samuel Austin, Jr., and the notes and deeds were duly assigned by said Austin to the orators, after the decease of said Dow. The estate of Dow was represented insolvent by the administrators upon their appointment, and upon the settlement it turns out to be so in fact. There were other notes executed by Dow to Austin, not secured, and which were, by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Briggs v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1829
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- King v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hurlbert v. BrighamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- Bridgman v. St. Johnsbury & Lake Champlain R. R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1885
- People v. E. Remington & SonsNew York Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.