Legal Opinion

Crosby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 1986No. 85-1207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed based on the following briefly stated legal analysis.

First, the defendant Larry Crosby was temporarily detained — but not arrested, as urged — when police officers physically prevented him from boarding a train at the Amtrak station, detained him for five to six minutes, and conducted a “dog sniff,” by a trained narcotics dog, of a shoulder bag he was carrying. The fact that the defendant Crosby missed his train as a result of the detention cannot convert same into an arrest. Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Login v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. GoodleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Mata v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. State v. RamosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LamarcheCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API