Legal Opinion
Graybill v. Swift & Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1988No. 16520Published
1Opinion of the Court
766 P.2d 763 (1988)
115 Idaho 293
Robert GRAYBILL, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
SWIFT & COMPANY, Employer, and Royal Insurance Company, Surety, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 16520.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
October 14, 1988.
Emil F. Pike, Jr., Twin Falls, for claimant-appellant.
Penland & Munther, Boise, for defendants-respondents. Paul S. Penland, argued.
BAKES, Justice.
Claimant sustained an industrial accident and injury while employed by respondent Swift & Company. The doctors diagnosed claimant as having a back strain, accompanied by complaints of back pain and right and left thigh pain. No objective…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Baldner v. Bennett's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Paulson v. Idaho Forest Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Montgomery v. Delta Concrete Products Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Wood v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.