Legal Opinion
People v. Hacker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 19, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Application, pursuant to People v Bachert (69 NY2d 593), for writ of error coram nobis.
Defendant contends on this application that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel upon the appeal from his judgment of conviction (115 AD2d 787). More specifically, defendant asserts that he was denied his constitutional right to proceed pro se in County Court (see, Faretta v California, 422 US 806; People v Davis, 49 NY2d 114; People v McIntyre, 36 NY2d 10) and that appellate counsel failed to raise this issue upon the appeal.
We agree that the issue concerning defendant’s right to proceed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BachertNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hacker v. HerbertDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- People v. GutkaissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People ex rel. King v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. WaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007