Legal Opinion

McDonough v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 2019No. 18-485PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor

*2153Petitioner Edward McDonough alleges that respondent Youel Smith fabricated evidence and used it to pursue criminal charges against him. McDonough was acquitted, then sued Smith under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The courts below, concluding that the limitations period for McDonough's fabricated-evidence claim began to run when the evidence was used against him, determined that the claim was untimely. We hold that the limitations period did not begin to run until McDonough's acquittal, and therefore reverse.

I

This case arises out of an investigation into forged absentee ballots that were submitted in a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrade v. ChoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
  2. Housing4All, LLC v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  3. Thomas v. City of TroyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
  4. Towne v. DonnellyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. Young v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API