Legal Opinion
Khairullah v. Meyer
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 31, 2025No. 3:23-cv-30095Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOHAMED KHAIRULLAH, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Civil Action No. 23-30095-MGM v. * * JAMES R. MCHENRY,1 acting Attorney * General of the United States, in his * Official Capacity, et al. * * Defendants. * ORDER January 31, 2025 MASTROIANNI, U.S.D.J. Defendants have filed an in camera, ex parte memorandum of law, as well as an in camera, ex parte declaration, in support of their request to transfer venue. (Dkt. Nos. 34, 35.) While the publicly filed memorandum of law (Dkt. No. 33) limits the transfer argument to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.