Rawdon v. Redfield
The Superior Court of New York City
Case subject to the opinion of the court. " The cause was by consent argued before the Chief Justice alone, in whose opinion the facts are sufficiently stated.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court. Oakley, Ch. J.
This is an action on a-bill of exchange, drawn by a party in the city of Troy on a firm in this city, payable to and indorsed by the defendant, then residing at Troy, and which was subsequently indorsed to .the'plaintiff. The bill was accepted, and at its maturity was not paid. Issue was taken on the presentment of the bill for payment, and on the service of notice of protest and non-payment on the defendant.
There is no question as to the presentment of the bill for payment. The difficulty, if any, arises on the proof of the service of the notice of protest; it…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Whitridge v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
- Brighton Market Bank v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860
- Greenwich Bank v. De GrootNew York Supreme Court · 1876