Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Weiss v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1929No. 27,012Published

1ConcurrenceStone, J.

The “Certificate of Attending Physician” was a part of the proofs of loss required from plaintiff as the beneficiary of the policy. It was furnished by plaintiff. Any statement therein contained, by whomsoever made, against the interest of plaintiff is competent as an admission against interest. Therefore the document in question was competent evidence.

The next question is whether it was ruled upon at the trial — - whether as evidence it is in or out of the case. No other evidence by defendant was admitted to prove its defense. Therefore when in his finding's the trial judge said “that no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. BruceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API