Legal Opinion

W.R.B. Corporation, D/B/A Robertson Construction Company v. Odell Geer, D/B/A Odell Geer Company, and B.H. (Bert) Camp, D/B/A b.h.c.materials Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1964No. 20999_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

On its former appearance in this Court, W. R. B. Corp. v. Geer, 5 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 750, we remanded this case because the District Judge had not properly applied the clearly erroneous standard in the review of the findings of the special master. F.R.Civ.P. 53(e) (2). Our reconsideration on the briefs and argument and the record made by the District Judge on remand reveals two things without question. First, on remand the District Court carefully applied the correct legal standard which we epitomized in our former opinion. Second, applying those standards, there was ample basis for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. W.R.B. Corp. v. GeerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. First Texas Prudential Ins. Co. v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Oviett v. WarnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Isthmian Lines, Inc. v. Burl HaireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Janke v. JankeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Central Tow Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Clark v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
  5. Corporacion Salvadorena De Calzado, S.A. v. Injection Footwear Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API