Legal Opinion

Frederickson v. Hackney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1924No. 23,945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by the purchaser for the breach of an alleged warranty of a Holstein Freisan bull calf. There was no express warranty and a verdict was directed for defendant on the ground that no implied warranty existed. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying'his motion for a new trial.

Both plaintiff and defendant are breeders of thoroughbred Holstein Freisan cattle. Plaintiff purchased two cows from defendant. Both were with calf when delivered to him. Defendant had reserved the calves to himself, but, a few days after birth of the male in question, plaintiff purchased him of defendant for $500.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McQuaid v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. White v. StellohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Griffin v. RunnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mousel v. WidickerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Heil v. Standard Chemical Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Backus v. MacLauryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Foster v. Copiah County Co-Operative, AAL.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API