Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bostic

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1983No. 80-3-816PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*347OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

This appeal raises a single, legal issue, namely, whether the sentencing of appellants to consecutive prison terms upon their convictions for aggravated robbery and for committing a crime of violence while in possession of a firearm violates their rights under the double jeopardy clauses of the federal and state constitutions to be protected against multiple punishments for one offense. We find that appellants’ consecutive sentences do not violate double jeopardy principles.

On October 14, 1972, appellants, Alton Bradby and Joseph Bostic, held up a food market in Bucks…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. SojournerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API