Randolph v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Gilkison, C. J.
I am in dissent with the majority opinion, for reasons as follows:
*69As affecting the issue presented in this appeal, Art. 1, Sec. 1 of our state constitution provides:
“We Declare, That all men . . . are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; . . ,”1
Partially implementing this provision of our state constitution the legislature, long ago enacted a statute as follows:
“A defendant is presumed to be innocent until the contrary is proved. . . .” Sec. 9-1806 Burns’ 1942 Repl., Sec.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hill v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Batchelor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.