Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 2009No. A09A0778PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Naomi Smith appeals her conviction for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to give her requested charge on “mere presence.” We hold that the accomplice’s testimony identifying Smith as the owner of the purse containing the cocaine was corroborated and that a “mere presence” instruction was unnecessary. Accordingly, we affirm.

When reviewing a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Short v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. State v. VoglesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Vogleson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Torres v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API