Clary v. Harnett
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Smith (E. N.), J.
The petitioner’s operator’s license has been revoked because of his having violated subdivision 5 of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, which provides that the operating of a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition constitutes a misdemeanor. Subdivision 2 of section 71 of said law provides that upon conviction of such violation the revocation of an operator’s license is mandatory. _____,
On the 1st of October, 1938, the petitioner was arrested by a State trooper on a charge of having violated said subdivision 5 of section 70; he was brought before a justice of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ohmann v. HarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- Compitello v. MealeyNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Schapiro v. MealeyNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- In re Albroza, New York County Courts1940