Legal Opinion

Fasce v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1942No. 28261Published

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

By this action, Lewis Fasce, his son-in-law and copartner, Henry Bertero, and their wives, sought to recover damages from Dorcas Clark, an in surance broker doing business as Clark Investment Company, for the breach of an alleged oral contract to procure public liability insurance for a Mack truck owned by the plaintiffs. The superior court entered findings, conclusions, and judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiffs appealed.

For many years prior to December 9, 1936, appellants had operated a truck garden near Everett. They owned a Studebaker truck, which was in daily use, and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BerteroWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lewis v. BerteroWashington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API