Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1988No. 64A03-8802-CV-46PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Dr. R.K. Ellis presents an interlocutory appeal from a denial of summary judgment. After a medical review panel concluded that defendant met the applicable standard of care, plaintiffs brought a medical malpractice suit against Dr. Ellis in Porter Superi- or Court.

In their complaint, the Smiths alleged that Dr. Ellis failed to fully inform them of the risks of an elective surgical procedure. Dr. Ellis performed foot surgery on Michael A. Smith, who suffers from muscular dystrophy. The procedure was intended to correct equine contractions and allow Michael to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burke v. CapelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Revord Ex Rel. Revord v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Yang v. StaffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Cunningham v. Associates Capital Services Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Bell v. HortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jordan v. DeeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Watson v. Medical Emergency Services, Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Culbertson v. MernitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bunch v. TiwariIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Hoskins v. SharpIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API