Legal Opinion

United States v. Courtland

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 27, 2011No. 10-2436, 10-2468, 10-2469PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Derrick Courtland, John Bacon and Joseph Addison pleaded guilty to a dog fighting conspiracy and the district court sentenced them to varying terms of incarceration above the guidelines recommendation. Each defendant appeals his sentence, requesting that this court reverse the district court and remand for resentencing. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

This case arises from a loosely-organized dog fighting conspiracy in the St. Louis metro area called the “Backstreet Truez,” and connected with a kennel of that name. A combined state and federal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Candis Flint v. City of BelvidereCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Charles GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API