Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1951PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is only with respect to one judicially declared incompetent that no one has authority to act on his behalf until a committee has been appointed (Finch v. Goldstein, 245 N. Y. 300). There is no proof in this record that the claimant has ever been declared incompetent; therefore under section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, the notice could have been served by claimant himself or by someone “ on behalf of the claimant”. Anybody could have served the notice — a relative or a friend — on behalf of the claimant. The only purpose of the statute is to give the city notice of an accident or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finch v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Winbush v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Claim of Johnson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Estate of Davis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Smith v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API