Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 18, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00460Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION SEAN PATRICK R.! Case No. 3:18-CV-00460-AC Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge: Introduction Plaintiff Sean Patrick Reilly (‘Plaintiff’) brings this action under the Social Security Act (“SSA”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for Social Security Disability Insurance 1 Tn the interest of privacy, this Findings and Recommendation uses only…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API