Legal Opinion

Gould, Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 10, 1991No. Misc. A. No. 91-0271PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.’s (“Mitsui”) Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37. By its motion Mitsui seeks an order compelling the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to produce certain documents that Mitsui claims are relevant to civil litigation between it and Gould, Inc. (“Gould”) currently pending before the Honorable Charles W. Joiner in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Case No. C85-3199). Mitsui also seeks to compel the oral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baldrige v. ShapiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Durnan v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  4. Lessner v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API