Legal Opinion

Logue v. Jordan

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1992No. 2910186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a judgment after remand. For facts pertinent to the original appeal, see Logue v. Jordan,586 So.2d 946 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991).

In that appeal, we determined that Logue was denied due process in that he did not have the opportunity to defend himself against an accusation of delinquent child support payments. We remanded the case for a hearing on the allegations.

A hearing was held on September 3, 1991. Jordan appeared pro se. Logue did not appear due to his incarceration in the Alabama penal system. He was, however, represented by court-appointed counsel.

The trial court entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Binns v. MaddoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Argo v. CarterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Logue v. JordanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spry v. IkerdCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. State Department of Human Resources ex rel. Briley v. DobbinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Epps v. KarrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API