Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Co. v. Stinson Printing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1924No. Appeal, No. 14Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

Pursuant to a written contract, made in October, 1914, plaintiff, in March, 1915, installed a telephone in.defendant’s business office at Sewickley, where it remained until August, 1916; this action was to recover for the use thereof during that time. The court of common *316pleas, reversing the county court, allowed the claim, and, from the affirmance of such allowance by the Superior Court, defendant brought this appeal.

We find nothing in the record calling for reversal. True, the contract provided, inter alia: “This contract to be effective only in the event and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska Ex Rel. OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Central Railroad v. MauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Schaper v. Cleveland & Erie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API