Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. Jasso-Barajas
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 8, 2013No. 1 CA-CV 12-0085PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether the trial court erred by awarding attorneys’ fees to plaintiff/appellee Andrew Bradshaw pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 77(f) without first deducting Rule 68(g) sanctions from the verdict. Because the court properly interpreted and applied both rules, we affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The facts are undisputed. After a car accident, Bradshaw sued Maricela Jasso-Barajas for negligence. Jasso-Barajas filed an answer and subsequently served Bradshaw with a $9501 offer of judgment, including…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Poulson v. OFACKCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Elliott v. Progressive Halcyon InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Reyes v. Frank's Service & Trucking, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Apodaca, Sr. v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Pino-Alvarez v. ErlichmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020