Legal Opinion
Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.
Oregon Tax Court
Decided October 4, 2006No. TC 4737PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court for decision after trial. Plaintiff Kurt E. Freitag (Freitag) represented Plaintiffs (taxpayers) pro se. Defendant Department of Revenue (the department) was represented by counsel.
II. FACTS
In early 2005, taxpayers appealed the value of real property located in Lincoln County to the Magistrate Division of this court. At a May 12, 2005, case management conference, the taxpayers and the defendant in that case (the county) agreed to hold a second conference on July 11, 2005, for the purpose of discussing whether discovery would be permitted to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. StamperOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Lambert v. American Dream Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leaper v. Dept. of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2008
- Bleoaja v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4930 (or.tax 7-19-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
- Spears v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4891 (or.tax 12-7-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
- Spears v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4891 (or.tax 4-2-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
- Spears v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4891 (or.tax 4-20-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010