Legal Opinion

Williams v. McClellan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

This is a demurrer, by the defendant McClellan, to the complaint, on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is to recover $60,000 damages alleged to have been suffered because of alleged perjury, committed by the defendants, pursuant to a conspiracy between them, in an action in which the plaintiff herein was the plaintiff, and Naomi Duncombe Ring and others were the defendants.

The substance of the allegations of the complaint is that the plaintiff, relying upon certain statements made to him by the defendants concerning the execution of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young v. LeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Felts v. ParadiseTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. John Allan Co. v. BrandowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
  4. Stolte v. BlackstoneNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API