Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dunn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1938No. 1557Published

1Dissent

WILLIAMS, Circuit) Judge

(dissenting)-

I am unable to concur in the holding that Section 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment, U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 21, § 2, is not self-executing.

*122The Senate of the United States, on May 28, 1938, passed Bill (H,R. 7508) to amend the Liquor Enforcement Act of 1936, so as to read as follows, to-wit:

“Sec. 3. Whoever shall import, bring, or transport any intoxicating liquor into any State in which all sales (except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, or mechanical purposes) of intoxicating liquor containing more than 5 percent of alcohol by weight are prohibited,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Guinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API