Legal Opinion · Dissent
Dunn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 24, 1938No. 1557Published
1Dissent
WILLIAMS, Circuit) Judge
(dissenting)-
I am unable to concur in the holding that Section 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment, U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 21, § 2, is not self-executing.
*122The Senate of the United States, on May 28, 1938, passed Bill (H,R. 7508) to amend the Liquor Enforcement Act of 1936, so as to read as follows, to-wit:
“Sec. 3. Whoever shall import, bring, or transport any intoxicating liquor into any State in which all sales (except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, or mechanical purposes) of intoxicating liquor containing more than 5 percent of alcohol by weight are prohibited,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Guinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.