Coyle v. Interurban Street Railways Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Charles J. Coyle against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From the judgment the parties prosecute cross-appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.
These are cross-appeals from a judgment rendered in an action brought under section 104 of the railroad law (Laws 1892, p. 1406, c. 676) to recover three penalties of $50 each, based on *137three alleged refusals by defendant to furnish transfers from ope street railroad line to another. Judgment was given in favor of plaintiff for two penalties based upon defendant’s refusals to furnish him transfers on two separate occasions. The third penalty was sought to be recovered under an assigned claim of one Roach, to whom a transfer had been also refused on one of the occasions when 'the plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blake v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Fox v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
- Topham v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904