Bidelman Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones:
The majority opinion seems to me to proceed upon an erroneous legal premise and, as a natural consequence, unnecessarily inflicts a hardship upon the decedent’s only daughter and testamentary favorite. But, more serious still, is the effect in general which the decision is bound to have, for it virtually constitutes a flat repudia- ( tion of the rationale whereon there have been uniformly' based a century’s decisions by. the courts of this State relative to the care and protection of the property of? weak or feeble-minded persons who, by due…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Bryden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Interboro Bank and Trust Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Gerlach's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Frew's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.