Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bidelman Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1948No. Appeal, 34Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones:

The majority opinion seems to me to proceed upon an erroneous legal premise and, as a natural consequence, unnecessarily inflicts a hardship upon the decedent’s only daughter and testamentary favorite. But, more serious still, is the effect in general which the decision is bound to have, for it virtually constitutes a flat repudia- ( tion of the rationale whereon there have been uniformly' based a century’s decisions by. the courts of this State relative to the care and protection of the property of? weak or feeble-minded persons who, by due…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoffman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Bryden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Interboro Bank and Trust Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Gerlach's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Frew's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API