In re Dworsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. Respondent, a Schenectady County attorney, was suspended from practice by this Court in December 2003 for three years, effective October 15, 2001 (Matter of Dworsky, 2 AD3d 1205 [2003]). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner does not oppose the application.
We conclude that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rules governing reinstatement…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re DworskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003