Legal Opinion

Shaeffer v. Smyth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1932No. 2343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The Ward-Harrison Mortgage Company being desirous of selling mortgage notes to the Pan American Dife Insurance Company, said parties, on February 2, 1920, entered into a contract in which the mortgage company is designated as first party and the insurance company as second party.

The portions of the contract material here are as follows:

“Now, therefore, in consideration of the premises and the sum of one dollar in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby fully acknowledged said first party has agreed to and does hereby make to second party as a basis of said purchases and sales the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Leonard v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Provident Savings Life Assur. Society of New York v. EllingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Rugely v. Moore, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaeffer v. SmythTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Capital Reserve Corporation v. Rosa Mae Day, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  3. Capital Reserve Corporation v. Rosa Mae Day, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  4. Shaeffer v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API