Legal Opinion

Rose v. Osborne

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

On report. Thrice heretofore these parties have presented litigation to this Court pertaining to the three savings accounts still involved: viz., one in Androscoggin County Savings Bank of Lewiston, Maine, another in Savings Bank of New London, Connecticut, and still another in Mariners Savings Bank, also of New London.

That first determined was the ownership of these «accounts between the plaintiff, the administratrix of the estate of Jacob W. Silliker, the depositor, and George Osborne, Jr., his nephew, the latter having claimed all of them by reason of alleged gifts inter vivos. In that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murray v. CarothersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  2. Rose v. OsborneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  3. Birmingham v. LesanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  4. Estate of Silliker v. OsborneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  5. Annis v. Security Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API