Legal Opinion
McMahon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 4, 1990No. 90-1295PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
567 So.2d 988 (1990)
Daniel McMAHON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1295.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
October 4, 1990.
Daniel McMahon, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
The appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks clarification of this court's sua sponte order which determined that this case is inappropriate for review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g)[1] and which ordered appellant to file a brief. We grant the request for clarification.
Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief in the circuit court…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Dowling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Ketion v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
4Cited by4 opinions
- Janes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Ransom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Millard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992