Legal Opinion

Conner v. Denney

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 21, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY M. GRIFFIN, Special Commissioner.

The principal question before this court is whether it was error for the trial judge on the first day of the term of court, after determining that the jury panel lacked three persons of the number required by law, to direct the sheriff to summon three bystanders to complete the panel.

On the day of trial the appellant moved the court to strike the three bystanders from the regular panel on the ground that the bystanders were not drawn from the drum as required by KRS 29.280.

The trial judge sustained appellant’s motion in regard to juror Charlie Sterns,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Morgan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Morgan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API