Legal Opinion
State v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided January 26, 1990No. 63,548PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rees, J.:
This is a direct appeal by defendant Michael Roberts from his jury convictions for sale of heroin (K.S.A. 65-4127a; K.S.A. 65-4101[p][l]) and sale of cocaine (K.S.A. 65-4127a; K.S.A. 65-4101[p][4]).
The primary question raised for our resolution is whether the trial court erred in refusing to exclude the testimony of John Wimbish, the State’s principal witness.
Wimbish was an investigator assigned to the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) unit stationed at Fort Riley. Acting as an undercover agent, Wimbish made off-installation buys of narcotic drugs from defendant Michael…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- United States v. Michael A. WolffsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Foy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court · 1995