Legal Opinion
Romansky v. Shalala
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 15, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-1153PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*130 MEMORANDUM
LANCASTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Alex Romansky, appeals the Secretary of Health & Human Services’s decision to reduce his social security disability benefits by the full amount plaintiff received from a commuted lump sum settlement of a workers’ compensation award. The Secretary reduced plaintiffs social security disability benefits pursuant to the “offset” provision of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 424a.
Plaintiff challenges that portion of the offset that reduced his benefits by the amount he received for a permanent facial disfigurement under section 306(c) of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wilkerson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Albert E. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Gerald v. HODGE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Joe W. Grant v. Casper W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- R.G. Kinzler, Trustee of a Trust for the Benefit of K. Kinzler v. WCAB (Assoc. for Vascular Access & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Steets, K., Aplt. v. Celebration Fireworks (WCAB)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025