Legal Opinion

Battle v. . Shore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Tbe only question presented by tbis appeal is whether tbe plaintiff is tbe owner of tbe land wbicb be bas contracted to sell and convey to tbe plaintiff. Tbe facts involved in tbis question are admitted in tbe pleadings. Upon these facts, it was adjudged tbat plaintiff is not entitled to a decree of specific performance.

Plaintiff claims title to tbe land under tbe will of Horace Battle, deceased, wbicb bas been duly probated and recorded. Horace Battle was tbe owner in fee and in possession of tbe land at tbe date of bis death. By bis will be devised tbe land to bis wife, Harriet Battle “for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paul v. . WilloughbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Brown v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API