Clack v. Jones

On Motion for Rehearing

William S. Boyle, of Reno, for Appellant. H. J. Murrish and John A. Jurgenson, both of Love-lock, for Respondent.

OPINION

By the Court, Ducker, J.:

The motion for a hearing must be denied. It is based upon the alleged insufficiency of the affidavit by which the contempt proceedings were initiated. This question was not determinable on the appeal taken, nor can it be considered on this motion, because the appeal was premature. A paper filed by appellant with the motion also needs attention. It was entitled “Opening Brief in support of Motion for Rehearing.” After the…