Hendrix v. State

SEARS, Chief Justice.

The appellant, David Hendrix, appeals from his convictions for murder and other crimes stemming from the deaths of Algernon Nash and Rodney Rozier. On appeal, Hendrix contends, among other things, that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to sever his case from that of his co-defendant, Kenny Hilton. For the reasons that follow, we find no merit to Hendrix’s contentions and affirm his convictions.

1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows that a rational trier of fact would…