Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schwandt v. Bates

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1964No. 9318Published

1DissentKnudson, Chief Justice

Under the opinion written by Justice Smith the judgment is reversed upon the ground that the trial court committed prejudicial error by instructing the jury on the last clear chance doctrine because “there is no substantial evidence to support the doctrine.” In order that the reasons for my dissent may be clearly understood I consider it necessary to mention more of the facts than are stated in said opinion.

The uncontradicted evidence discloses that the accident occurred within an intersection at approximately 1:30 a. m.; the street surface was dry and visibility was good. Plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Drury v. PalmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Coughran v. HickoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Graham v. MilsapIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API