Applera Corp. v. MJ Research Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Motion of MJ Research, Inc. for Summary Judgment Determining that Plaintiffs’ Licensing Scheme Imposes a Total Sales Royalty [Doc. #1123] and Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment Seeking a Determination that Applera’s Licensing Program does not Impose an Improper Total Sales Royalty and Thus is Not Patent Misuse [Doc. # 1153]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendant/counterclaim plaintiff MJ Research, Ine. [“MJ”] and plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants Applera Corp. 1 and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. have filed cross motions for summary judgment on defendant’s patent misuse…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heublein, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Linzer Products Corp. v. SekarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- On Track Innovations Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015