Legal Opinion

Applera Corp. v. MJ Research Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 22, 2004No. 3:98 CV 1201 JBAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruling on Motion of MJ Research, Inc. for Summary Judgment Determining that Plaintiffs’ Licensing Scheme Imposes a Total Sales Royalty [Doc. #1123] and Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment Seeking a Determination that Applera’s Licensing Program does not Impose an Improper Total Sales Royalty and Thus is Not Patent Misuse [Doc. # 1153]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Defendant/counterclaim plaintiff MJ Research, Ine. [“MJ”] and plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants Applera Corp. 1 and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. have filed cross motions for summary judgment on defendant’s patent misuse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Heublein, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Linzer Products Corp. v. SekarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. On Track Innovations Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API