Legal Opinion
Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. National Indian Gaming Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2014-0958Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FORT SILL APACHE TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-958 (ESH) NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Fort Sill Apache Tribe (the “Fort Sill Apaches” or the “Tribe”), a federally recognized Indian tribe, brought this action against the National Indian Gaming Commission (the “NIGC”); Jonodev Chaudhuri, Chairman of the NIGC; the Department of the Interior (“DOI”); Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior; 1 Michael Black, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs; and the United States. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.