Legal Opinion

(PC) Bishop v. Camacho

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 2, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01762Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOR AHMADD BISHOP, Case No. 2:20-cv-01762-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 13 v. ECF No. 15 14 P. CAMACHO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff moves for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 15. 19 Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand 20 v. Rowland,

113 F.3d 1520, 1525

(9th Cir. 1997), and the court lacks the authority to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. McCormick v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API