Carl Robinson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal from the denial of appellant’s habeas petition presents a question of compliance with the requirement of Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974), that before sentencing a young offender as an adult the sentencing judge must make an explicit finding that there would be no benefit to sentencing under the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5005 et seq. Dorszynski was applied retroactively in this circuit in Hoyt v. United States, 502 F.2d 562 (5th Cir. 1974), and so governs the sentencing of this appellant.
Appellant’s motion for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Herbert Edward Hoyt, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Daniel Lee Sappington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cardova Lawary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Roy Soto Puente v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Algie J. Walls v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Juan Carlos Duran, Jorge Duran-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- John Edward McKnabb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.