Ruby v. Ruby

Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Contrary to plaintiffs contentions, Supreme Court did not rely solely on the child’s needs in determining child support, and the court made a “record articulation” of its reasons for not applying the statutory percentage to the parental income in excess of $80,000 (Matter of Cassano v Cassano, 85 NY2d 649, 655; see, Matter of Dower v Niewiadowski, 233 AD2d 847, 848). We further reject plaintiffs contention that the court erred in calculating the interest…